<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: DISH Network TurboHD Review</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.satellitereviews.com/2008/08/04/dish-network-turbohd-review/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.satellitereviews.com/2008/08/04/dish-network-turbohd-review/</link>
	<description>www.satellitereviews.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 11:04:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: wawood</title>
		<link>http://www.satellitereviews.com/2008/08/04/dish-network-turbohd-review/comment-page-1/#comment-696</link>
		<dc:creator>wawood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Apr 2011 23:53:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.satellitereviews.com/2008/08/04/dish-network-turbohd-review/#comment-696</guid>
		<description>no fx news?????  fx  business????</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>no fx news?????  fx  business????</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David M. Gonzalez</title>
		<link>http://www.satellitereviews.com/2008/08/04/dish-network-turbohd-review/comment-page-1/#comment-695</link>
		<dc:creator>David M. Gonzalez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 May 2010 19:14:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.satellitereviews.com/2008/08/04/dish-network-turbohd-review/#comment-695</guid>
		<description>I am quite impressed so far with many of the DISH network services. The Dou DVR 722 converter box is awsome. It is better than any sat box I have worked with, and works better than TIVO. The Sat dish, The LNB&#039;s, and the reciever in combination work excellent. Even at low signal strengths I get great picture with no interuptions of service.
The instruction manual is easy to read. 
Then they send me a Qualified Sat Technician/installer that doeas the job like a true proffessional installing my system, and explaining it.  A real proffessional. They even give me direct tech support from the field service techs which is outrageous. 
Best of all they give me a channel line up that is fun to watch, and interactive programmining that is 
excellent with potential for growth. It cost about $690.00 to lock in one year of programming of 
top 200/local channels/HD/and DVR, and it is worth it.  I have never been happier, and my familly loves it. DISH NETWORK IS QUALITY. I can,t wait till they offer there own Broadband internet capability.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am quite impressed so far with many of the DISH network services. The Dou DVR 722 converter box is awsome. It is better than any sat box I have worked with, and works better than TIVO. The Sat dish, The LNB&#8217;s, and the reciever in combination work excellent. Even at low signal strengths I get great picture with no interuptions of service.<br />
The instruction manual is easy to read.<br />
Then they send me a Qualified Sat Technician/installer that doeas the job like a true proffessional installing my system, and explaining it.  A real proffessional. They even give me direct tech support from the field service techs which is outrageous.<br />
Best of all they give me a channel line up that is fun to watch, and interactive programmining that is<br />
excellent with potential for growth. It cost about $690.00 to lock in one year of programming of<br />
top 200/local channels/HD/and DVR, and it is worth it.  I have never been happier, and my familly loves it. DISH NETWORK IS QUALITY. I can,t wait till they offer there own Broadband internet capability.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fashion watch</title>
		<link>http://www.satellitereviews.com/2008/08/04/dish-network-turbohd-review/comment-page-1/#comment-694</link>
		<dc:creator>Fashion watch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Apr 2010 02:11:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.satellitereviews.com/2008/08/04/dish-network-turbohd-review/#comment-694</guid>
		<description>how many channels are actually transmitted in FULL HD?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>how many channels are actually transmitted in FULL HD?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: roger</title>
		<link>http://www.satellitereviews.com/2008/08/04/dish-network-turbohd-review/comment-page-1/#comment-693</link>
		<dc:creator>roger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 19:27:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.satellitereviews.com/2008/08/04/dish-network-turbohd-review/#comment-693</guid>
		<description>You people need to use this so called GOOD DEAL for about 6 mo. then read your own comments . What a joke...................</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You people need to use this so called GOOD DEAL for about 6 mo. then read your own comments . What a joke&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Johnson</title>
		<link>http://www.satellitereviews.com/2008/08/04/dish-network-turbohd-review/comment-page-1/#comment-692</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Johnson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2009 15:03:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.satellitereviews.com/2008/08/04/dish-network-turbohd-review/#comment-692</guid>
		<description>This is a good deal for most viewers.  How many channels of TV can a normal person actually make use of?
My only complaint is that I paid the extra $6/mo for local channels, but the &quot;local&quot; PBS channel is actually the national feed, rather than KCET (I live in Santa Barbara, and we got KCET from our COX cable service).  This makes absolutely no sense to me, but DISH is a large company, and can&#039;t be bothered with this oddity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a good deal for most viewers.  How many channels of TV can a normal person actually make use of?<br />
My only complaint is that I paid the extra $6/mo for local channels, but the &#8220;local&#8221; PBS channel is actually the national feed, rather than KCET (I live in Santa Barbara, and we got KCET from our COX cable service).  This makes absolutely no sense to me, but DISH is a large company, and can&#8217;t be bothered with this oddity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rex</title>
		<link>http://www.satellitereviews.com/2008/08/04/dish-network-turbohd-review/comment-page-1/#comment-691</link>
		<dc:creator>Rex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Jun 2009 16:49:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.satellitereviews.com/2008/08/04/dish-network-turbohd-review/#comment-691</guid>
		<description>Turbo HD rocks!  I cant say enough about this service.   Left Time Warner cable two months ago for Turbo HD, and couldnt be happier.  Not only is my bill about $50 less than with TWC, but I dont miss a thing when it comes to channels.  Sure I lost some shopping networks, but anything worth watching at all is on the Turbo HD gold lineup, and the DishDVR rocks too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Turbo HD rocks!  I cant say enough about this service.   Left Time Warner cable two months ago for Turbo HD, and couldnt be happier.  Not only is my bill about $50 less than with TWC, but I dont miss a thing when it comes to channels.  Sure I lost some shopping networks, but anything worth watching at all is on the Turbo HD gold lineup, and the DishDVR rocks too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: john</title>
		<link>http://www.satellitereviews.com/2008/08/04/dish-network-turbohd-review/comment-page-1/#comment-690</link>
		<dc:creator>john</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 20:35:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.satellitereviews.com/2008/08/04/dish-network-turbohd-review/#comment-690</guid>
		<description>if you have direct tv switch it is cheaper and there is alot more hd channels and they are all worth watching and recording we can put up to 500 hours on our hddvr switch if you can it is so much bettter</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>if you have direct tv switch it is cheaper and there is alot more hd channels and they are all worth watching and recording we can put up to 500 hours on our hddvr switch if you can it is so much bettter</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: john</title>
		<link>http://www.satellitereviews.com/2008/08/04/dish-network-turbohd-review/comment-page-1/#comment-689</link>
		<dc:creator>john</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 20:33:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.satellitereviews.com/2008/08/04/dish-network-turbohd-review/#comment-689</guid>
		<description>We just switched and i was blown away i love the turbo hd gold it is the best we have had i love it and would recommend this to anyone i know it is even better than our old directtv it is cheaper too we even get more premium movie channels than we did before we switched</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We just switched and i was blown away i love the turbo hd gold it is the best we have had i love it and would recommend this to anyone i know it is even better than our old directtv it is cheaper too we even get more premium movie channels than we did before we switched</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron</title>
		<link>http://www.satellitereviews.com/2008/08/04/dish-network-turbohd-review/comment-page-1/#comment-688</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 21:09:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.satellitereviews.com/2008/08/04/dish-network-turbohd-review/#comment-688</guid>
		<description>I actually like these packages.  I really don&#039;t care about 90% of the channels provided by cable or satellite.  Lets face it, if you have time to watch all these channels you probably need to get a lfe.
I am thinking of subscribing to the TurboHD because 1.  Its cheap, 2.  It has all the basic channels I want and 3.  Its all in HD.  
On top of that, I can get a two-room dvr so I can watch the few shows I like in either my family room or bedroom.  
Not everyone needs or wants 100 channels.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I actually like these packages.  I really don&#8217;t care about 90% of the channels provided by cable or satellite.  Lets face it, if you have time to watch all these channels you probably need to get a lfe.<br />
I am thinking of subscribing to the TurboHD because 1.  Its cheap, 2.  It has all the basic channels I want and 3.  Its all in HD.<br />
On top of that, I can get a two-room dvr so I can watch the few shows I like in either my family room or bedroom.<br />
Not everyone needs or wants 100 channels.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: paul</title>
		<link>http://www.satellitereviews.com/2008/08/04/dish-network-turbohd-review/comment-page-1/#comment-687</link>
		<dc:creator>paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 03:51:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.satellitereviews.com/2008/08/04/dish-network-turbohd-review/#comment-687</guid>
		<description>how many channels are actually transmitted in FULL HD?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>how many channels are actually transmitted in FULL HD?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

