<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: DIRECTV vs Charter Cable</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.satellitereviews.com/2009/11/27/direct-tv-charter-cable/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.satellitereviews.com/2009/11/27/direct-tv-charter-cable/</link>
	<description>www.satellitereviews.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 11:04:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jacob</title>
		<link>http://www.satellitereviews.com/2009/11/27/direct-tv-charter-cable/comment-page-1/#comment-1400</link>
		<dc:creator>Jacob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2011 23:26:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.satellitereviews.com/?p=1305#comment-1400</guid>
		<description>Charter is the best. My friends have Direct TV, and it&#039;s horrid. When using the menu, it lags and freezes up; it&#039;s all very jumbled and overwhelming on the eyes. Plus, get this: A lot of the movies that I watch for free On Demand, they have to pay $3.99 for. How ridiculous is that? I&#039;ve noticed that Charter releases movies a lot faster and overall, that&#039;s all I care about. Direct TV may have better clearity, features, DVR, ect., but it&#039;s menu sucks, the DVR menu is a mess, and a lot of the big titles that Charter has for free, cost money from Direct TV. Oh! And the biggest gripe: Their programming is set to an Eastern time zone, and living on the west coast, that&#039;s horrible. I&#039;ve stayed the night at these friends, and around midnight, I&#039;ll start looking for a good movie to watch, and what do I see? Paid programming. Why? Because it&#039;s like 4 o&#039; clock on the East Coast, and most of the late movies are over. If you want to have a movie night with friends, and you have Direct TV, you&#039;d have to settle down at 6 p.m. just to browse for a movie. Ridiculous. Charter may not be the best, but I love their On Demand, and when it comes down to it, that&#039;s all I really care about. I can&#039;t even access my friend&#039;s Direct TV on demand because it requires internet, which is another scam.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Charter is the best. My friends have Direct TV, and it&#8217;s horrid. When using the menu, it lags and freezes up; it&#8217;s all very jumbled and overwhelming on the eyes. Plus, get this: A lot of the movies that I watch for free On Demand, they have to pay $3.99 for. How ridiculous is that? I&#8217;ve noticed that Charter releases movies a lot faster and overall, that&#8217;s all I care about. Direct TV may have better clearity, features, DVR, ect., but it&#8217;s menu sucks, the DVR menu is a mess, and a lot of the big titles that Charter has for free, cost money from Direct TV. Oh! And the biggest gripe: Their programming is set to an Eastern time zone, and living on the west coast, that&#8217;s horrible. I&#8217;ve stayed the night at these friends, and around midnight, I&#8217;ll start looking for a good movie to watch, and what do I see? Paid programming. Why? Because it&#8217;s like 4 o&#8217; clock on the East Coast, and most of the late movies are over. If you want to have a movie night with friends, and you have Direct TV, you&#8217;d have to settle down at 6 p.m. just to browse for a movie. Ridiculous. Charter may not be the best, but I love their On Demand, and when it comes down to it, that&#8217;s all I really care about. I can&#8217;t even access my friend&#8217;s Direct TV on demand because it requires internet, which is another scam.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: christopher</title>
		<link>http://www.satellitereviews.com/2009/11/27/direct-tv-charter-cable/comment-page-1/#comment-1399</link>
		<dc:creator>christopher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Feb 2011 05:17:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.satellitereviews.com/?p=1305#comment-1399</guid>
		<description>Personally, I’ve had cable and I’ve had DirecTV and frankly there are advantages to both situations. I mean there are many things to consider when trying figuring out a service provider. There are prices, programming, customer service reputation, quality of equipment and others. Being a customer and employee of DISH Network, I can say that from a consumer stand point that DISH was the way to go for me even before working here. The third HD receiver was free, DISH&#039;s DVR have the largest hard in the industry, so more recording time, 100% digital programming, the most HD channels in the industry, HD free for life, and Video on Demand in 1080p. There are plenty of reasons to go with DISH! (:</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Personally, I’ve had cable and I’ve had DirecTV and frankly there are advantages to both situations. I mean there are many things to consider when trying figuring out a service provider. There are prices, programming, customer service reputation, quality of equipment and others. Being a customer and employee of DISH Network, I can say that from a consumer stand point that DISH was the way to go for me even before working here. The third HD receiver was free, DISH&#8217;s DVR have the largest hard in the industry, so more recording time, 100% digital programming, the most HD channels in the industry, HD free for life, and Video on Demand in 1080p. There are plenty of reasons to go with DISH! (:</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

